Quantcast

Sturgis-Coldwater News

Wednesday, December 25, 2024

State Sen. Lindsey: Democrats have 'made our elections less safe, less secure'

Webp lindsey

State Sen. Jonathan Lindsey | Facebook

State Sen. Jonathan Lindsey | Facebook

State Sen. Jonathan Lindsey (R-17) said that recent laws passed by Michigan Democrats have "made our elections less safe, less secure" and also led to a decrease of confidence in voters that their votes are being heard. 

"So far the consequences of the constitutional amendments and the many laws that the Democrats have passed in the last year and a half is that they've made our elections less safe, less secure, and they've created a situation where the people of Michigan have deeper and deeper concerns about the way our elections are conducted," Lindsey told Sturgis-Coldwater News. "What we would like to do is return to a form of running elections that honors every legal voter's rights and provides an opportunity to vote, but that also through the proper legislative process creates a framework where our elections are run with integrity and the people can have faith in them."

On July 1, Lindsey and ten other Michigan legislators filed their principal brief with the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Their appeal challenges what they perceive as violations of their constitutional rights regarding the regulation of federal elections.

The legislators’ original lawsuit was filed after amendments made in 2018 and 2022 by the state of Michigan changed election laws in a way that did not require approval from state legislatures. This was in violation of Article I, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, known as the Elections Clause, which grants state legislatures the explicit authority to oversee the time, place, and manner of federal elections, according to a release from Michigan Fair Elections.

The original lawsuit was dismissed in April 2024 by a District Court, citing lack of standing rather than the merits of their case, meaning the court determined the legislators were not the proper group to bring the issue to a court. 

“If I, as a legislator, don’t have standing to say election laws are being passed without legislature approval, then who does?” State Rep. Steve Carra (R), one of the plaintiffs and leader of the House Freedom Caucus, said. “The Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution protects legislative authority to determine the times, places, and manner of elections.”

Lindsey also found issue with the court’s statement. “I disagree with the judge's decision to deny my right as a legislator to protect the role granted to me by the U.S. Constitution,” he said. “When a federal judge misuses their power by denying a valid case to be heard, it damages our entire body politic. I am pleased we are appealing this decision.”

The lawsuit, formally known as Case No. 1:23-cv-1025, names Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and Jonathan Brater, Director of the Bureau of Elections, as defendants. It centers on amendments that introduced substantial changes to Michigan's election laws, including provisions for same-day voter registration, early voting periods, and alterations to in-person voting procedures.

The eleven legislators who are plaintiffs in this case are State Sens. Jonathan Lindsey (R-17) and Jim Runestad (R-23), and State Reps. Steve Carra (R-36), James DeSana (R-29), Joseph Fox (R-101), Neil Friske (R-107), Matt Maddock (R-51), Brad Paquette (R-37), Angela Rigas (R-79), Joshua Schriver  (R-66), and Rachelle Smit (R-43). 

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate